Public knowledge document

Benchmarking clustering, alignment, and integration methods for spatial transcriptomics.

Background Spatial transcriptomics (ST) is advancing our understanding of complex tissues and organisms. However, building a robust clustering algorithm to define spatially coherent regions in a single tissue slice and aligning or integrating multiple tissue slices originating from diverse sources for essential downstream analyses remains challenging. Numerous clustering, alignment, and integration methods have been specifically designed for ST data by leveraging its spatial information. The absence of comprehensive benchmark studies complicates the selection of methods and future method development. Results In this study, we systematically benchmark a variety of state-of-the-art algorithms with a wide range of real and simulated datasets of varying sizes, technologies, species, and complexity. We analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each method using diverse quantitative and qualitative metrics and analyses, including eight metrics for spatial clustering accuracy and contiguity, un

Benchmarking clustering, alignment, and integration methods for spatial transcriptomics.

> 商业许可源文 · EUROPE_PMC · [CC-BY](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/)

书目信息

  • 引用:Hu Y, Xie M, Li Y, Rao M, Shen W, Luo C, Qin H, Baek J, Zhou XM. (2024). Benchmarking clustering, alignment, and integration methods for spatial transcriptomics. Genome biology. PMID 39123269 · PMC11312151 · DOI 10.1186/s13059-024-03361-0
  • 证据类型:BENCHMARK
  • 主题:rna-seq、spatial-omics
  • 被引次数(采集时):95
  • 原始记录:[Europe PMC](https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39123269)
  • 来源许可:[CC-BY](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/)
  • 作者摘要(按来源许可复用)

    Background Spatial transcriptomics (ST) is advancing our understanding of complex tissues and organisms. However, building a robust clustering algorithm to define spatially coherent regions in a single tissue slice and aligning or integrating multiple tissue slices originating from diverse sources for essential downstream analyses remains challenging. Numerous clustering, alignment, and integration methods have been specifically designed for ST data by leveraging its spatial information. The absence of comprehensive benchmark studies complicates the selection of methods and future method development. Results In this study, we systematically benchmark a variety of state-of-the-art algorithms with a wide range of real and simulated datasets of varying sizes, technologies, species, and complexity. We analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each method using diverse quantitative and qualitative metrics and analyses, including eight metrics for spatial clustering accuracy and contiguity, uniform manifold approximation and projection visualization, layer-wise and spot-to-spot alignment accuracy, and 3D reconstruction, which are designed to assess method performance as well as data quality. The code used for evaluation is available on our GitHub. Additionally, we provide online notebook tutorials and documentation to facilitate the reproduction of all benchmarking results and to support the study of new methods and new datasets. Conclusions Our analyses lead to comprehensive recommendations that cover multiple aspects, helping users to select optimal tools for their specific needs and guide future method development.

    合规说明

    本页保存的是来源文献书目信息及其在 CC-BY 许可下公开的作者摘要。除去除来源 HTML 标签和规范化空白外,摘要未作内容改写。本页不代表 GeniOmics 的医学建议;原文版权、署名和许可仍归原权利人,请通过原始记录核对最新版本、更正或撤稿状态。

    Benchmarking clustering, alignment, and integration methods for spatial transcriptomics. · GeniOmics